Compare AI tools

	Figma AI A	Claude Code S	NotebookLM S	Grammarly A
Tagline	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Google's research notebook. Turns your docs into a podcast.	Grammar check + tone + AI drafting, everywhere you type.
Category	Design	Coding	Research	Writing
Pricing	Included with Figma plans	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free	Free + $12-$15/mo Premium + team plans
Best for	Designers already on Figma.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Students, researchers, anyone with a stack of PDFs or a topic to learn.	Non-native English writers, business email, anyone who types a lot.
Strengths	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Upload anything, ask questions, get cited answers Audio Overview turns docs into a 10-min podcast Great for studying	Works in every browser/app Now has generative AI (GrammarlyGO) Tone detection + suggestions
Weaknesses	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Google-only Can be slow on large corpora	Can feel naggy Premium features gate basics Privacy concerns (reads your writing)
Kai's verdict	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for study. The Audio Overview is a killer feature. Try it with three of your favorite PDFs.	A-tier for non-native English speakers. B-tier if your English is already strong — Claude does better with tone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →