Compare AI tools

	Figma AI A	Claude Code S	OpenRouter S	GitHub Copilot B
Tagline	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	One API, every model. Pay-as-you-go, no subscriptions.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.
Category	Design	Coding	Dev Platform	Coding
Pricing	Included with Figma plans	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Pay per token — model-dependent	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business
Best for	Designers already on Figma.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers experimenting across models. Apps that want fallback logic.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.
Strengths	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	300+ models from one endpoint Automatic fallbacks between providers No subscription — just pay what you use	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete
Weaknesses	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Slight markup over direct API Some provider features not exposed	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies
Kai's verdict	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for model-shopping. I use this for every prototype before committing.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →