Compare AI tools

	Figma AI A	Cursor S	Claude Code S	Ideogram S
Tagline	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	The one that actually gets text in images right.
Category	Design	Coding	Coding	Image
Pricing	Included with Figma plans	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $8/mo + $20/mo + $60/mo
Best for	Designers already on Figma.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Anything with text — posters, ads, album covers, slide decks.
Strengths	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Best text rendering in the game Strong free tier Good for logos, posters, thumbnails
Weaknesses	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Less style variety
Kai's verdict	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for text-in-image. Use this for posters, Midjourney for art.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →