Compare AI tools

	Figma AI A	GitHub Copilot B	Symphony A	Replicate S
Tagline	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	OpenAI's open-source daemon that turns your Linear board into an always-on coding agent factory — tickets go in, pull requests come out.	Run any open-source AI model with an API call.
Category	Design	Coding	Agents	Dev Platform
Pricing	Included with Figma plans	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free (open-source)	Pay per second of compute
Best for	Designers already on Figma.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Engineering teams already using Linear + OpenAI Codex who want to stop babysitting agent sessions and instead let the issue tracker drive autonomous coding at scale.	Developers using open-source models (Flux, SDXL, Whisper, etc).
Strengths	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Fully autonomous ticket-to-PR pipeline: every open Linear issue gets its own isolated Codex agent without manual supervision Fault-tolerant Elixir/OTP architecture automatically restarts crashed agents and manages hundreds of concurrent runs WORKFLOW.md keeps all orchestration policy version-controlled inside the repo, so agent behavior is reproducible and reviewable like code Proven internal results: OpenAI reported a 500% increase in landed PRs on some teams within three weeks Open spec encourages community re-implementations in any language, not just Elixir	Tens of thousands of models (image, video, audio, LLMs) One-line API for any model Cog framework for custom model deploy
Weaknesses	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Currently only supports Linear as an issue tracker — GitHub Issues and Jira integrations are not yet official Only OpenAI Codex is officially supported as the agent runtime; other model integrations are community-contributed and incomplete Self-hosted, Elixir-dependent engineering preview with no built-in sandboxing — not suitable for untrusted or production environments out of the box	Cold starts on less-popular models Pricing gets real at scale
Kai's verdict	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	Symphony is the most architecturally serious 'issue tracker as control plane' approach yet — 15K GitHub stars in weeks confirms the idea resonates — but it's still a rough, self-hosted engineering preview that demands Elixir chops and a Linear-only workflow. (Verdict pending Phi's full review.)	S-tier for open-source model APIs. The default in this space.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →