Compare AI tools

	Adobe Firefly A	GitHub Copilot B	Leonardo.ai A	Google Veo A
Tagline	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.
Category	image	coding	image	video
Pricing	Free + included with Creative Cloud	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$60/mo	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools
Best for	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.
Strengths	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding
Weaknesses	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need
Kai's verdict	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →