Compare AI tools

	Adobe Firefly A	GitHub Copilot B	Recraft S	Luma Dream Machine A
Tagline	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.
Category	image	coding	image	video
Pricing	Free + included with Creative Cloud	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$48/mo	Free + $10-$500/mo
Best for	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.
Strengths	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots
Weaknesses	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier
Kai's verdict	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →