Compare AI tools

	Framer A	Claude Code S	Google Veo A	Figma AI A
Tagline	Design + publish sites with AI assists built in.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Design	Coding	Video	Design
Pricing	Free + $5-$30/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Designers shipping marketing sites without engineers.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	AI generates sections + copy + layouts Designer-first publishing (not just templates) Great animations	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Less flexible than raw code Pricing per-site adds up	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	A-tier for designer-led sites. S-tier if animations matter.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →