Compare AI tools

	Galileo AI B	Claude S	Claude Code S	Perplexity S
Tagline	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.
Category	Design	Chatbots	Coding	Research
Pricing	Free trial + paid plans	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Pro
Best for	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.
Strengths	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context
Weaknesses	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →