Compare AI tools

	Galileo AI B	Claude Code S	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A
Tagline	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	design	coding	coding	design
Pricing	Free trial + paid plans	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →