Compare AI tools

	Galileo AI B	Cline A	Claude Code S	Gemini A
Tagline	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	Open-source VS Code agent. Reads + writes + runs.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.
Category	Design	Coding	Coding	Chatbots
Pricing	Free trial + paid plans	Free (open source) + your API costs	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)
Best for	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	VS Code users who want agentic coding without changing IDEs.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.
Strengths	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Free extension for VS Code Plan + Act modes Model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, local) Sees terminal output and iterates	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous
Weaknesses	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Can burn tokens fast if not watched Less polished than Cursor	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	A-tier. Best free agentic option in VS Code. Use with Claude for best results.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →