Compare AI tools

	Gamma A	GitHub Copilot B	Kling A	Claude S
Tagline	AI slide decks that don't look AI-generated.	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.
Category	Productivity	Coding	Video	Chatbots
Pricing	Free + $10-$20/mo	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Credit-based, free trial	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise
Best for	Pitch decks, proposals, internal presentations — fast.	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.
Strengths	Strong templates Decks, docs, webpages Doesn't look generic	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing
Weaknesses	Locked into Gamma's format Export quality varies	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers
Kai's verdict	A-tier. Best of a boring category. Use it for first drafts, then edit in Keynote if high-stakes.	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →