Compare AI tools

	Gemini A	Claude Code S	Ideogram S	NotebookLM S
Tagline	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	The one that actually gets text in images right.	Google's research notebook. Turns your docs into a podcast.
Category	chat	coding	image	research
Pricing	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free + $8/mo + $20/mo + $60/mo	Free
Best for	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Anything with text — posters, ads, album covers, slide decks.	Students, researchers, anyone with a stack of PDFs or a topic to learn.
Strengths	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Best text rendering in the game Strong free tier Good for logos, posters, thumbnails	Upload anything, ask questions, get cited answers Audio Overview turns docs into a 10-min podcast Great for studying
Weaknesses	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Less style variety	Google-only Can be slow on large corpora
Kai's verdict	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for text-in-image. Use this for posters, Midjourney for art.	S-tier for study. The Audio Overview is a killer feature. Try it with three of your favorite PDFs.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →