Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
Gemini A | Luma Dream Machine A | Claude Code S | Hex A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | Modern data notebook with Magic AI assistant. |
| Category | chat | video | coding | data |
| Pricing | Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive) | Free + $10-$500/mo | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free + $28+/user/mo |
| Best for | Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Data teams at startups + enterprises. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | A-tier for data teams. S-tier if you already live in SQL + Python. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |