Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Claude S	Galileo AI B	Figma AI A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Coding	Chatbots	Design	Design
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Free trial + paid plans	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →