Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Claude S	Midjourney S	Claude Code S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	The aesthetic gold standard for AI image generation.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	coding	chat	image	coding
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	$10-$120/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Anyone who wants beautiful images without thinking about prompts.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Best-in-class art direction v7 is stunning Great style consistency	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	No free tier Discord-first UX (web now available) Less controllable than ComfyUI	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier for aesthetics. If you care how it looks more than how it's made, this wins.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →