Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Claude S	Midjourney S	Raycast AI S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	The aesthetic gold standard for AI image generation.	Mac launcher + AI. Command-bar genius.
Category	Coding	Chatbots	Image	Productivity
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	$10-$120/mo	Free (app) + $10/mo AI
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Anyone who wants beautiful images without thinking about prompts.	Power users on Mac who type a lot.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Best-in-class art direction v7 is stunning Great style consistency	Invoke AI from anywhere on Mac with a hotkey Choose your model (Claude, GPT, etc.) AI Commands for repeatable workflows
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	No free tier Discord-first UX (web now available) Less controllable than ComfyUI	Mac-only Monthly AI sub on top of free app
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier for aesthetics. If you care how it looks more than how it's made, this wins.	S-tier if you're on Mac. The fastest way to get AI answers without context-switching.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →