Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Claude S	Raycast AI S	Kling A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Mac launcher + AI. Command-bar genius.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.
Category	Coding	Chatbots	Productivity	Video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Free (app) + $10/mo AI	Credit-based, free trial
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Power users on Mac who type a lot.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Invoke AI from anywhere on Mac with a hotkey Choose your model (Claude, GPT, etc.) AI Commands for repeatable workflows	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Mac-only Monthly AI sub on top of free app	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier if you're on Mac. The fastest way to get AI answers without context-switching.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →