Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Claude S	Google Veo A	Luma Dream Machine A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.
Category	coding	chat	video	video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Free + $10-$500/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →