Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Claude Code S	OpenRouter S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	One API, every model. Pay-as-you-go, no subscriptions.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	coding	coding	dev platform	design
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Pay per token — model-dependent	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers experimenting across models. Apps that want fallback logic.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	300+ models from one endpoint Automatic fallbacks between providers No subscription — just pay what you use	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Slight markup over direct API Some provider features not exposed	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for model-shopping. I use this for every prototype before committing.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →