Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Claude Code S	Raycast AI S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Mac launcher + AI. Command-bar genius.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Coding	Coding	Productivity	Design
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	Free (app) + $10/mo AI	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Power users on Mac who type a lot.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Invoke AI from anywhere on Mac with a hotkey Choose your model (Claude, GPT, etc.) AI Commands for repeatable workflows	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Mac-only Monthly AI sub on top of free app	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier if you're on Mac. The fastest way to get AI answers without context-switching.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →