Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Cline A	Runway S	Cursor S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Open-source VS Code agent. Reads + writes + runs.	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.	VS Code fork that made AI coding actually work.
Category	coding	coding	video	coding
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free (open source) + your API costs	Free + $15-$95/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + $40/mo Business
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	VS Code users who want agentic coding without changing IDEs.	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.	Developers. Non-developers who want to ship working code.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Free extension for VS Code Plan + Act modes Model-agnostic (Claude, GPT, local) Sees terminal output and iterates	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade	Tab completion feels like mind-reading Composer for multi-file edits Runs Claude, GPT, Gemini — you pick
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Can burn tokens fast if not watched Less polished than Cursor	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing	Can feel overwhelming for non-coders Expensive at scale
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Best free agentic option in VS Code. Use with Claude for best results.	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.	S-tier for coding. If you write code of any kind, this pays back the $20 in a day.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →