Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	DALL-E 3 B	Leonardo.ai A	Kling A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.
Category	Coding	Image	Image	Video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Free + $12-$60/mo	Credit-based, free trial
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →