Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
GitHub Copilot B | DeepSeek S | Claude Code S | Claude S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. | Chinese open-weight powerhouse. Crazy cheap, genuinely smart. | Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly. | Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context. |
| Category | coding | chat | coding | chat |
| Pricing | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business | Free web + ultra-cheap API (~$0.14/M input tokens) | Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans | Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise |
| Best for | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. | Developers + cost-conscious builders. Anyone fine with self-hosting. | Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs. | Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. | S-tier for price/performance. A-tier for consumer use. If you build apps, this is the budget pick. | S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement. | S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |