Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Devin A	Adobe Firefly A	Gamma A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	AI slide decks that don't look AI-generated.
Category	coding	agents	image	productivity
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	$500/mo	Free + included with Creative Cloud	Free + $10-$20/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Pitch decks, proposals, internal presentations — fast.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Strong templates Decks, docs, webpages Doesn't look generic
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	Locked into Gamma's format Export quality varies
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	A-tier. Best of a boring category. Use it for first drafts, then edit in Keynote if high-stakes.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →