Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Elicit S	Claude S	Grok A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.
Category	Coding	Research	Chatbots	Chatbots
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →