Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Elicit S	DALL-E 3 B	Genspark A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.
Category	Coding	Research	Image	Research
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$42/mo	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Free + $25/mo Plus
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →