Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Elicit S	Leonardo.ai A	Recraft S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.
Category	Coding	Research	Image	Image
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free + $12-$60/mo	Free + $12-$48/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →