Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
GitHub Copilot B | Elicit S | Luma Dream Machine A | DeepSeek S | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. | AI research assistant for academic literature. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. | Chinese open-weight powerhouse. Crazy cheap, genuinely smart. |
| Category | coding | research | video | chat |
| Pricing | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business | Free + $12-$42/mo | Free + $10-$500/mo | Free web + ultra-cheap API (~$0.14/M input tokens) |
| Best for | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. | Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. | Developers + cost-conscious builders. Anyone fine with self-hosting. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. | S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. | S-tier for price/performance. A-tier for consumer use. If you build apps, this is the budget pick. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |