Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Elicit S	Recraft S	Stable Audio A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.	Stability AI's open audio model. Loops + SFX + background.
Category	coding	research	image	audio
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free + $12-$48/mo	Free + $12/mo Pro + enterprise
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.	Game developers, podcasters needing SFX, video creators needing background music.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs	Open-weight model available Great for loops + game audio + SFX Commercial-use clarity
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers	Not for full songs with vocals Shorter generation limits
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.	A-tier for its niche. Different use case than Suno — SFX and loops, not songs.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →