Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Elicit S	Google Veo A	ChatGPT Operator B
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	OpenAI's browser agent. Clicks and types on websites for you.
Category	coding	research	video	agents
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$42/mo	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Included with ChatGPT Pro $200/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Power users willing to pay $200/mo for a browser bot.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Actually uses websites — fills forms, clicks, checks out Built into ChatGPT Good for repetitive web tasks
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	Slow vs doing it yourself Breaks on complex auth flows $200/mo gate
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	B-tier. Still early. Manus is more flexible for less money.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →