Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Fathom S	Grok A	Sora A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Meeting notes, free forever for individuals.	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.
Category	coding	meeting	chat	video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free for individuals + $15-$29/user/mo teams	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Solo operators, freelancers, small teams on a budget.	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Unlimited free tier for solo use Strong summaries + action items Works in Zoom, Meet, Teams	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Bot-joining model Team features gated	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for solo + free. The best free option, hands down.	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →