Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Fathom S	Luma Dream Machine A	Adobe Firefly A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Meeting notes, free forever for individuals.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.
Category	coding	meeting	video	image
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free for individuals + $15-$29/user/mo teams	Free + $10-$500/mo	Free + included with Creative Cloud
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Solo operators, freelancers, small teams on a budget.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Unlimited free tier for solo use Strong summaries + action items Works in Zoom, Meet, Teams	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Bot-joining model Team features gated	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier for solo + free. The best free option, hands down.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →