Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A	Claude Code S	Claude Agent SDK S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.	Anthropic's SDK for building your own agents on Claude.
Category	Coding	Design	Coding	Agents
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans	API usage + SDK is free
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.	Developers building custom agents for their own company/product.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks	Production-grade agent primitives Built on Claude (best reasoning) Full control — build exactly what you need
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription	Developer-only You build the UI
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.	S-tier for builders. The right primitives. What Kai is built on under the hood.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →