Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A	Adobe Firefly A	Claude Agent SDK S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Anthropic's SDK for building your own agents on Claude.
Category	Coding	Design	Image	Agents
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans	Free + included with Creative Cloud	API usage + SDK is free
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Developers building custom agents for their own company/product.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Production-grade agent primitives Built on Claude (best reasoning) Full control — build exactly what you need
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	Developer-only You build the UI
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	S-tier for builders. The right primitives. What Kai is built on under the hood.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →