Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A	Genspark A	Luma Dream Machine A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.
Category	Coding	Design	Research	Video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans	Free + $25/mo Plus	Free + $10-$500/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →