Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A	Granola S	Claude Code S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	Meeting notes that don't suck. Runs locally, no bot joins.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	Coding	Design	Meetings	Coding
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans	Free + $18/mo	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.	Founders, execs, consultants who live in calls.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	No bot in the call — runs on your Mac Strong templates Fast summaries	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Mac-only Single-user by design	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier. Category-defining UX. If you take notes in meetings, switch this week.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →