Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Figma AI A	OpenRouter S	Claude Code S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.	One API, every model. Pay-as-you-go, no subscriptions.	Anthropic's CLI agent. Opus-powered, operates on your repo directly.
Category	coding	design	dev platform	coding
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Included with Figma plans	Pay per token — model-dependent	Part of Claude Pro/Max/Team plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers already on Figma.	Developers experimenting across models. Apps that want fallback logic.	Developers who want an agent, not autocomplete. Large refactors, tests, docs.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search	300+ models from one endpoint Automatic fallbacks between providers No subscription — just pay what you use	Runs locally, edits your actual files Strong on large codebases with 1M context Great at multi-step tasks
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out	Slight markup over direct API Some provider features not exposed	Terminal-based — learning curve Can't be used without Claude subscription
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.	S-tier for model-shopping. I use this for every prototype before committing.	S-tier if you live in the terminal. Different shape than Cursor — complementary, not replacement.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →