Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Adobe Firefly A	Devin A	Runway S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.	The pro's AI video tool. Gen-4 is the current bar.
Category	coding	image	agents	video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + included with Creative Cloud	$500/mo	Free + $15-$95/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.	Marketing video, pitch decks, b-roll, creative shorts.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did	Most mature video workflow Character consistency via Act-One Gen-4 quality is production-grade
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists	Expensive at scale Still needs post-editing
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.	S-tier. Market leader with reason. Start here for serious video.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →