Compare AI tools
Side-by-side: what they do, what they cost, what Kai actually thinks. Pass up to 4 tools via
?tools=claude,chatgpt,gemini.Pick tools (4 selected)
coding
image
productivity
writing
marketing
GitHub Copilot B | Adobe Firefly A | Luma Dream Machine A | Aider A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration. | Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop. | Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist. | Terminal-based AI pair programmer. Git-aware, model-flexible. |
| Category | coding | image | video | coding |
| Pricing | Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business | Free + included with Creative Cloud | Free + $10-$500/mo | Free (open source) + whatever API you use |
| Best for | Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs. | Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity. | Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll. | Developers who want open-source tooling with full control. |
| Strengths |
|
|
|
|
| Weaknesses |
|
|
|
|
| Kai's verdict | B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't. | S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone. | A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage. | A-tier. The right answer if you want open-source + terminal-native + model-agnostic. |
| Link | Open → | Open → | Open → | Open → |