Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Adobe Firefly A	Google Veo A	Leonardo.ai A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Commercially safe image gen, deeply integrated with Photoshop.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.
Category	coding	image	video	image
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + included with Creative Cloud	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools	Free + $12-$60/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone in Creative Cloud. Brands that need copyright clarity.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Trained on licensed content — commercially safe Generative Fill in Photoshop is incredible Native to Adobe ecosystem	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney Tied to Adobe subscription	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	S-tier inside Photoshop (Generative Fill). B-tier standalone.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →