Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Galileo AI B	Elicit S	Genspark A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	AI agent for deep search. Generates Sparkpages — full mini-reports.
Category	Coding	Design	Research	Research
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free trial + paid plans	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free + $25/mo Plus
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Travel planning, shopping comparisons, deep research where you want an artifact back.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Sparkpages = curated multi-source mini-articles Agent can book, compare, shop Autopilot agent for long tasks
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Early-stage — rough edges Less reliable than Perplexity for simple questions
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	A-tier. Bet on this one — the Sparkpage format is genuinely new.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →