Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Galileo AI B	Elicit S	Grok A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Prompt to UI design. Figma-ready outputs.	AI research assistant for academic literature.	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.
Category	Coding	Design	Research	Chatbots
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free trial + paid plans	Free + $12-$42/mo	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Designers brainstorming first drafts.	Grad students, researchers, anyone doing literature reviews.	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Prompt-to-UI with real layouts Exports to Figma Faster than hand-designing from scratch	Searches 125M+ papers Extracts + synthesizes findings across papers Systematic review workflow	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Output needs designer polish Pricing unclear / changes often	Academic-only Can hallucinate citations — verify everything	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	B-tier. Useful for first drafts. v0 is the better bet for shipping code.	S-tier for academic research. Nothing else comes close for systematic reviews.	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →