Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Gemini A	Claude S	Devin A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Google's answer. Best integrated with Workspace + free for a lot.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.
Category	coding	chat	chat	agents
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $20/mo Advanced (bundled with 2TB Drive)	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	$500/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone already on Google, research tasks, summarizing long documents.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Native Google Workspace integration Very long context (1M+) Deep Research feature Free tier is generous	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Writing quality trails Claude Over-refusals on edge content UI is cluttered	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. The Deep Research feature is genuinely useful. Don't sleep on it if you're already paying Google.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →