Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Grok A	Midjourney S	Figma AI A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	xAI's chatbot. Real-time X/Twitter data + fewer refusals.	The aesthetic gold standard for AI image generation.	AI features baked into the design tool you already use.
Category	Coding	Chatbots	Image	Design
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $30/mo SuperGrok + included with X Premium	$10-$120/mo	Included with Figma plans
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Breaking news, live event tracking, users already on X.	Anyone who wants beautiful images without thinking about prompts.	Designers already on Figma.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Live access to X posts for real-time events Less restrictive on edgy questions Fast inference on Grok-3 and up	Best-in-class art direction v7 is stunning Great style consistency	First drafts with Make Designs Rename/rearrange layers automatically Natural language asset search
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Writing quality trails Claude/ChatGPT Political bias debates Ecosystem is just X	No free tier Discord-first UX (web now available) Less controllable than ComfyUI	Features vary by plan + region Still rolling out
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for real-time. B-tier for everything else. Worth checking when news breaks.	S-tier for aesthetics. If you care how it looks more than how it's made, this wins.	A-tier. No reason not to use it if you're on Figma. Not worth switching for.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →