Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Kling A	Perplexity S	Flux (Black Forest Labs) A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.	Open weights + strong photorealism. The open-source answer.
Category	coding	video	research	image
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Credit-based, free trial	Free + $20/mo Pro	API + open weights (Schnell is Apache 2.0)
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.	Developers + power users who want control and privacy.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context	Runs locally on a beefy GPU Very photoreal Best open-weight model
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics	Harder to use than hosted tools Needs infra
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.	A-tier. S-tier if you self-host. The reason open-source image gen matters.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →