Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Leonardo.ai A	Claude S	Perplexity S
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	Anthropic's flagship — best reasoning + longest useful context.	AI search done right. Cited answers, not chat theater.
Category	coding	image	chat	research
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$60/mo	Free + $20/mo Pro + team/enterprise	Free + $20/mo Pro
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	Long writing, code, careful thinking, documents over 50 pages.	Replacing Google for any question where you want a cited answer in seconds.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Best-in-class writing + nuanced reasoning 1M context on Opus Artifacts for code/docs Lowest hallucination rate in my testing	Sources every claim Fast, current answers Pro Search runs multi-step research Spaces for persistent context
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Image generation is weak No native web search on all tiers	Not a general chatbot Answers can be shallow on complex topics
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	S-tier for reasoning and writing. If you only pay for one chatbot, pay for this one — especially for long work.	S-tier for search. I use it before Google now. If you're still Googling everything, try this for a week.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →