Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Leonardo.ai A	DALL-E 3 B	Kling A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	OpenAI's image model. Built into ChatGPT Plus.	Kuaishou's video model. The surprise standout.
Category	Coding	Image	Image	Video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$60/mo	Included with ChatGPT Plus $20/mo	Credit-based, free trial
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	ChatGPT Plus users who want images without paying extra.	Anyone who wants top-tier video quality for less.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Excellent prompt understanding Built into ChatGPT — no extra subscription Good at composition + concepts	Very strong motion + physics Often beats Runway on realism Great price
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Aesthetic ceiling below Midjourney + Ideogram Text rendering worse than Ideogram No fine control	UX is rough for English speakers Queue times
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	B-tier standalone, A-tier value if you already pay ChatGPT. Don't pay for it separately.	A-tier. Rising fast. If you can tolerate the UX, quality per dollar is best-in-class.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →