Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Leonardo.ai A	Sora A	Google Veo A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Gamer + creator image gen with model fine-tuning built in.	OpenAI's video model. Long clips, cinematic quality.	Google's video model. Baked into Gemini + YouTube Shorts.
Category	coding	image	video	video
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12-$60/mo	Included with ChatGPT Plus/Pro	Included with Gemini Advanced $20/mo + YouTube creator tools
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Indie game devs, illustrators, anyone training custom style models.	ChatGPT subscribers experimenting with cinematic shots.	Gemini Advanced users, YouTube Shorts creators.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Train your own models on your style/character Great for game art + concept art Generous free tier	Up to 20-sec clips at 1080p Strong physics + scene composition Storyboard feature for longer narratives Remix existing videos	Included with Gemini Advanced YouTube Shorts native integration Strong prompt understanding
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	General output behind Midjourney Can be overwhelming	Stricter content policy than competitors Hit-or-miss on complex motion Text-in-video still struggles	Still catching up on quality vs Kling/Runway Less control than pros need
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier for creators training custom looks. B-tier for general use.	A-tier. Amazing when it works, frustrating when it doesn't. Runway still more reliable for pros.	A-tier if you already pay Gemini. B-tier standalone.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →