Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Lex A	Recraft S	Devin A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Google Docs with an AI collaborator baked in.	Vector + raster AI for designers. Actually controls the output.	Cognition Labs' autonomous coding engineer.
Category	coding	writing	image	agents
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $12/mo	Free + $12-$48/mo	$500/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Essays, long-form drafts, thinking on the page.	Designers, brand teams, anyone needing vector output or tight style control.	Engineering teams offloading tickets. Ops/platform work.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Clean writing UX — distraction-free +++ prompt triggers AI help Collaboration + AI feedback together	Exports SVG vectors — rare in AI image gen Strong style control + consistency Brand kit for consistent outputs	Works like an engineer — takes Slack tasks, opens PRs Handles multi-hour engineering work Reports back with what it did
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Less feature-rich than Google Docs AI ceiling below dedicated tools	Less hyped than Midjourney Learning curve for non-designers	Expensive Best for well-scoped tasks Not for solo hobbyists
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Beautiful UX. The writing app I'd pick if I only wrote long-form.	S-tier for designers. The only one that takes vectors seriously.	A-tier for the right use case. Not for solo devs. If you manage engineers, try one license.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →