Compare AI tools

	GitHub Copilot B	Luma Dream Machine A	Aider A	Gamma A
Tagline	Microsoft/GitHub's autocomplete. Deep VS Code + JetBrains integration.	Smooth, cinematic motion. Image-to-video specialist.	Terminal-based AI pair programmer. Git-aware, model-flexible.	AI slide decks that don't look AI-generated.
Category	coding	video	coding	productivity
Pricing	Free (limited) + $10/mo Pro + $19/mo Business	Free + $10-$500/mo	Free (open source) + whatever API you use	Free + $10-$20/mo
Best for	Teams with GitHub already. Devs who don't want to change IDEs.	Photographers animating stills, cinematic b-roll.	Developers who want open-source tooling with full control.	Pitch decks, proposals, internal presentations — fast.
Strengths	Great enterprise story Works in your existing IDE Chat + autocomplete	Best image-to-video in the category Great camera motion control Ray 2 model produces striking shots	Works in any terminal Auto-commits changes with meaningful messages Works with any model (Claude, GPT, local) Minimal learning curve	Strong templates Decks, docs, webpages Doesn't look generic
Weaknesses	Less agentic than Cursor/Claude Code Model quality varies	Prompt fidelity below Runway Queue times on free tier	Terminal-only Less agentic than Claude Code Setup on Windows is fiddly	Locked into Gamma's format Export quality varies
Kai's verdict	B-tier. Solid for autocomplete but the category moved past it. Pick Cursor unless you can't.	A-tier. Best for cinematic image-to-video. Pair with Runway for coverage.	A-tier. The right answer if you want open-source + terminal-native + model-agnostic.	A-tier. Best of a boring category. Use it for first drafts, then edit in Keynote if high-stakes.
Link	Open →	Open →	Open →	Open →